Home

Overview

News & Events

Research

Publications

Contact  Information

Related Links

Members Only

Importance of polymer brushes and related morphologies

Why multiply-bound polymer chains?

Approaches to synthesis of multiply-bound polymer chains

Diagram to help understanding the telechelic attachment

Importance of polymer brushes and related morphologies

Manipulating properties of multiphase systems by controlling the chemistry at the interface is of paramount importance in a number of existing and emerging technologies, including: paints, pharmaceuticals, dyestuffs, adhesives, nano-filled polymers, biomedical implants, and tissue engineering. One common and successful method for modifying an interface of a material is to anchor polymer chains to the surface to change the interfacial structure and physicochemical properties of the interface. Polymer chains bound to an interface at one end have been the subject of intense interest in the past 25 years. This intriguing physical configuration arises in a wide variety of polymer structures and systems, including ordered phases of di- or triblock copolymer colloidal stabilization, and polymer micelles. Beyond the need to understand the properties of tethered chains for specific applications, there is great interest in the fundamental physical chemistry of these systems. Placing one end of the polymer chain at an interface introduces another length scale, i.e. the average distance between tethering points, which can dramatically effect the conformation of the chain. In particular, when the grafting density is high enough so that neighboring chains overlap, the crowed chains stretch away from the interface, forming a polymer brush. This stretched conformation is the defining characteristic of brushes, and results in unique aggregation, phase, and dynamic behavior. For example, brushes limit the collapse of the polymer chains in poor solvents. It has also been shown that frictional interactions are severely reduced when two brush-covered surfaces are brought into contact and sheared against each other. These simple examples show that systems of tethered chains can be used to dramatically change the structure and properties of the interface. On the other hand, with a moderate drafting density, the polymer chains can be viewed as more structurally and dynamically independent. In the polymer brush community, this regime is known as the "mushroom" regime. Bound polymer chains in either regime can alter the wet-ability, adhesion, chemical functionality, and structural stability of the interface. They also play a key role in colloidal stabilization, interfacial adhesion, and coatings formulations due to the interaction and entanglement between grafted polymers and their surrounding media.

Why multiply-bound polymer chains?

The focus on tethered polymers in the past two decades has been largely driven by their manifestation in a broad range of polymer systems. These systems include polymer micelles formed from diblock copolymers, the organization of diblock copolymers in microphase separated melts, behavior of diblock copolymers at fluid-fluid interfaces (i.e. as an interfacial compatibilizer), the use of tethered polymers as colloidal stabilizers, graft copolymers on surfaces, and the adsorption of diblock copolymers at hard interfaces. However, in every application of tethered polymers such as control of aggregation, adhesion, friction, and microphase morphology, a convincing case can be made that MBPCs can provide novel and often superior properties. For instance, because the MBPCs will not have chain ends at the periphery of the brush, MBPCs may further reduce interpenetration, and because of their connectivity, may provide higher segment densities at the edge of the layer. These factors may translate into reduced interpenetration of penetrant molecules, reduced frictional interactions, and reduced adsorption. For example, Irvine and coworker demonstrated that homopolymer stars tethered by their ends (thus producing loop-like structures) reduced protein adsorption more efficiently than layers of tethered linear chains. We expect our approach will allow further enhancement in properties by creating layers of loops at a fluid-solid interface. Another example of how our study could have significant technological impact is in controlling morphologies and properties of microphase separated multiblock (triblock, pentablock, etc...) copolymers, where their morphologies often contain loops at the microphase separated interfaces. The specific organization of these loops, controlling their assembly, and their contribution to viscoelastic properties is an unexplored, yet important, scientific and technological challenge that a detailed examination of the organization and dynamic behavior of MBPCs could significantly illuminate. Finally, because grafted polymers straddle soft interfaces, they can be used to reinforce interfaces. For example, in modifying a polymer-polymer interface, a copolymer at the interface that entangles with the homopolymer, strengthens that interface. The interaction of the extended chain with its surroundings plays an important role in the performance of this interfacial modifier. Recent results in our laboratory have demonstrated that a surface modified with loops manifests superior interfacial adhesion and steric stability than one modified with dangling chains (i.e. tails). Loop formation provides a mechanism for adhesion that is similar to a "molecular level Velcro", where the doubly bound polymers behave as loops and the polymer chains in the surrounding matrix act as the hooks. Thus, for applications such as colloidal stability and improvement of interfacial adhesion, the use of multiply-bound polymer chains should provide significant performance enhancement an versatility in the surface modification process.
Technologically, the grafting of a polymer chain is often associated with modification of the interfacial properties of the system. For instance in colloidal stabilization, a grafted polymer sterically shields the colloidal particles, preventing aggregation. Grafting of end-functionalized polymer chains to the surface is a common method to modify interfacial properties of a bulk sample where the surface coverage is an elementary parameter that defines the success of the grafting procedure. Experimental results suggest that multiply-bound polymer brushes offer a more efficient method to attain a homogeneous surface coverage than with singly tethered polymer brushes offering a more efficient and robust method for chemical modification of surface sensitive properties. One primary goal of this project is to optimize the MBPC as interfacial modifiers to tune and control a material's surface sensitive properties, including the stabilization of nanoparticles in a polymer matrix. Furthermore, we expect that the guidelines provided will be applicable to a wide range of materials. This is just one example of the potential societal impact of an improved understanding of using macromolecular chemistry to optimize the surface chemistry and physical chemistry of these important materials.
Lastly, the reactivity, structure, and properties of singly functional chains have also been examined at liquid-liquid interfaces primarily related to the in-situ formation of polymeric interfacial modifiers. These results indicate that the process whereby two functional polymers migrate to the liquid-liquid interface and react in-situ to form a diblock copolymer/brush is feasible. However, the specific aspects of chain localization to the interface, organization and reaction at the interface, and resultant brush structures are not well known. As our current understanding of interfacial modification by polymers suggests the presence of loops at the interface is critical to efficient interfacial strengthening, we will seek to expand this process to the reaction of telechelic polymers at liquid-liquid interfaces to form loop structures as interfacial modifiers in a reactive processing scheme. This reactive processing of telechelic additives in a phase separated multi-component polymer system can be viewed as complex formation of multiply-bound polymer chains at an interface. We will examine it as such, utilizing our knowledge of simpler MBPCs as guidelines.
In summary, for many polymer systems where grafted polymer chains are important, multiply-bound polymer chains will provide an opportunity for developing novel surfaces with significant performance improvement relative to singly tethered polymers.
Therefore, this project will provide a fundamental molecular level understanding of the structure and properties of multiply-bound polymer chains providing an exciting enabling technology for the engineering of the next generation polymer interfaces and polymer-modified surface.

 

Approaches to synthesis of multiply-bound polymer chains

This project will concentrate on three methods for synthesizing multiply-bound polymer chains. Our experiment indicates that each of these techniques has promise, but involves challenges and limitations that make the choice of approach dependent upon the specific application. We believe a thorough understanding of the factors controlling formation of MBPCs for each of these three processes will provide the versatility needed for the chemical design of specific grafted polymer systems for a wide variety of applications. These methods involve using I) amphiphilic A-B-A triblock copolymers that tether through the A blocks copolymers, II) end-functionalized star copolymers and III) telechelic polymers. In this proposal we refer to these methods as Processes I-III.
In process I, (the preferential adsorption of A-B-A triblock copolymers) the loops are formed when a selective solvent good for the B block but poor for the A blocks is used to tether the middle block by the shorter end blocks. Experimental and theoretical results suggest that these triblock 'telechelics' will adsorb on a surface and form crowded doubly bound chains in a loop conformation that are similar to that of a singly end-adsorbed polymer brushes of half its length. However, there has been very little work regarding the dynamic or mechanical properties of these brushes, or on the kinetics of assembly. In this proposed work, we will examine this process in detail to elucidate the fundamental properties that govern the organization and arrangement of loops on surfaces and their properties. process II leads to the formation of polymer loops by adsorption of amphiphilic star diblock copolymers. These materials will be assembled from selective solvents, where we believe that the polymer adsorption process has a large probability to produce loops at the interface than with a corresponding triblock. With the possibility of forming "domes" for stars with more than two bound ends. process III consists of designing a surface that contains a controlled amount of a reactive functionality. This surface is then brought into contact with a solution of telechelic polymers/oligomers that contain reactive end groups capable of reacting with the functional groups at the surface. Under the right conditions, the telechelics will react with the surface to form loops. This process is analogous to the 'grafting to' process for the synthesis of polymer brushes.

 

Diagram to help understanding the telechelic attachment

 

Last Update: 10/13/2004